<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EEC recomanda folosirea termenului de &#8220;render rate&#8221; in loc de &#8220;open rate&#8221;. Este insa corect?!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrei.whiteimage.net/2009/01/26/eec-recomanda-folosirea-termenului-de-render-rate-in-loc-de-open-rate-este-insa-corect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrei.whiteimage.net/2009/01/26/eec-recomanda-folosirea-termenului-de-render-rate-in-loc-de-open-rate-este-insa-corect/</link>
	<description>Andrei Georgescu</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 16:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: email - always under REconstruction &#187; Render, NOT open rate - email marketing</title>
		<link>http://andrei.whiteimage.net/2009/01/26/eec-recomanda-folosirea-termenului-de-render-rate-in-loc-de-open-rate-este-insa-corect/comment-page-1/#comment-10171</link>
		<dc:creator>email - always under REconstruction &#187; Render, NOT open rate - email marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrei.whiteimage.net/2009/01/26/eec-recomanda-folosirea-termenului-de-render-rate-in-loc-de-open-rate-este-insa-corect/#comment-10171</guid>
		<description>[...] Trebuie sa admint ca m-a luat gura pe dinainte cand am scris postul de aici&#8230;pentru ca l-am scris dupa ce am citit anuntul celor de la EEC, care in stil american exagereaza putin. Insa dupa ce am citit documentul de fundamentare al noilor indicatori propusi, pot sa spun ca, da, au mare sens. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Trebuie sa admint ca m-a luat gura pe dinainte cand am scris postul de aici&#8230;pentru ca l-am scris dupa ce am citit anuntul celor de la EEC, care in stil american exagereaza putin. Insa dupa ce am citit documentul de fundamentare al noilor indicatori propusi, pot sa spun ca, da, au mare sens. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

