<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spam 2.2 Reloaded</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrei.whiteimage.net/2008/08/10/spam-22-reloaded/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrei.whiteimage.net/2008/08/10/spam-22-reloaded/</link>
	<description>Andrei Georgescu</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 20:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: email - always under REconstruction &#187; CNN Spam - email marketing</title>
		<link>http://andrei.whiteimage.net/2008/08/10/spam-22-reloaded/comment-page-1/#comment-4436</link>
		<dc:creator>email - always under REconstruction &#187; CNN Spam - email marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrei.whiteimage.net/2008/08/10/spam-22-reloaded/#comment-4436</guid>
		<description>[...] Pe 10 august povesteam de spam-urile trimise ca venind din partea CNN aici se pare insa ca spam-ul a fost dezvoltat impreuna cu unii dezvoltatori de virusi, pentru ca asa cum anunta cei de la MX Logic aici (si am descoperit abia azi) virusul care insoteste spamul are rolul de a facilita distributia lui. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pe 10 august povesteam de spam-urile trimise ca venind din partea CNN aici se pare insa ca spam-ul a fost dezvoltat impreuna cu unii dezvoltatori de virusi, pentru ca asa cum anunta cei de la MX Logic aici (si am descoperit abia azi) virusul care insoteste spamul are rolul de a facilita distributia lui. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White Image &#187; Analiza de content - email marketing</title>
		<link>http://andrei.whiteimage.net/2008/08/10/spam-22-reloaded/comment-page-1/#comment-4321</link>
		<dc:creator>White Image &#187; Analiza de content - email marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrei.whiteimage.net/2008/08/10/spam-22-reloaded/#comment-4321</guid>
		<description>[...] De exemplu spam-urile care au la from CNN Alert (de care vorbea andrei aici), au un procent foarte bun in ceea ce priveste contentul, insa au o reputatie f proasta, IP-urile de unde sunt trimise fiind listate de Spamcop. Ok, intr-adevar intr-o structura de filtre pe layere nu ar fi trecut de filtrul de reputatie insa aceasta nu ar modifica procentul de 51,37% emailuri valide blocate. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] De exemplu spam-urile care au la from CNN Alert (de care vorbea andrei aici), au un procent foarte bun in ceea ce priveste contentul, insa au o reputatie f proasta, IP-urile de unde sunt trimise fiind listate de Spamcop. Ok, intr-adevar intr-o structura de filtre pe layere nu ar fi trecut de filtrul de reputatie insa aceasta nu ar modifica procentul de 51,37% emailuri valide blocate. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

